The Court of Appeal has ruled the first deportation flight taking asylum seekers to Rwanda can go ahead tomorrow.
Rights campaigners appealed against a decision by a lower court last week to allow the flight to go ahead but the appeal court said it “cannot interfere” with the original decision.
The flight is scheduled to go ahead tomorrow with 11 asylum seekers onboard.
Activists have argued that the government policy is inhumane and will put migrants at risk.
But officials have said the strategy will deter people from making dangerous Channel crossings from France in flimsy small boats run by smugglers.
The Home Office believes the removal plan for some migrants who arrive illegally in the UK is in the public interest and must not be stopped.
Referring to the decision made by the lower court, Lord Justice Singh said on Monday: “We consider that the judge produced a detailed and careful judgment which is all the more impressive in view of the time constraints under which he had to give it” in this “urgent and important case”.
The judges refused permission for an appeal to the Supreme Court against their decision.
Kigali hostel organisers want it to be as homely as possible
The Hope Hostel in Kigali is a guest house with 50 double bedrooms for 100 people. The first thing you’re greeted with on arrival is a sign that reads: “Come as a guest and leave as a friend.”
It’s clear they want it to be as homely as possible. Each room has amenities like shampoo, soap and toothpaste laid out on bedside tables, while the communal areas include computers with free internet.
There’s also a games room on the other side of compound which has scenic views of the city. You also get the sense they’re gearing up for the arrival of people from the Middle East, with Arabic signage everywhere as well as a prayer room and halal food served in the restaurant.
Outside, builders are at work, looking to finish what staff say will be a basketball court and additional outdoor space. There is also a “gift shop” where asylum seekers will be given essentials as well as packs of cigarettes.
As far as staff are concerned, the hostel is ready and it is as comfortable a space as possible.
The Public and Commercial Services union (PCS), which represents around 80% of Border Force staff, had brought Monday’s case, alongside charities Care4Calais and Detention Action.
A second case is being heard in the High Court after Asylum Aid, a refugee charity, applied for an urgent interim injunction to stop the government flying migrants to Rwanda.
Lawyers for the charity argued the procedure adopted by the government was unfair.
Downing Street has said that it remains the government’s plan for the flight taking asylum seekers to Rwanda to go ahead on Tuesday as planned.
The prime minister’s official spokesman said: “We certainly intend for there to be a flight tomorrow. That still remains the plan.”
As of Friday, around 130 people have been told they could be moved to Rwanda under the new scheme.
Lord Justice Singh suggested that the number on tomorrow’s flight could now be in single figures.
Raza Husain QC, for two people at risk of removal and the three organisations challenging the government’s policy, had earlier said Mr Justice Swift’s decision last week contained errors of principle or was “plainly wrong”.
He focused on the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees’ (UNHCR) concerns about Britain’s asylum flights.
The UN refugee agency holds an unequivocal position that the flight should not proceed.
Mr Husain said it was “abundantly clear” the Home Office’s view that Rwanda is a “safe third country” for asylum claims “was predicated on a complete misunderstanding” of the views of the UNHCR.
He added that asylum seekers “must be seen as a particularly underprivileged and vulnerable population group”.
He also said there is evidence of risks to individuals citing a UNHCR example of protests by refugees in Rwanda against food ration cuts in 2018, adding that “12 individuals were killed, 66 were arrested and some remain detained”.
Therefore, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees is “concerned that persons of concern relocated from UK to Rwanda may be at significant risk of detention and treatment not in accordance with international standards should they express dissatisfaction through protests after arrival”.
Mr Husain told the packed courtroom that British law says it has “never been a criminal offence to arrive in the UK without relevant documents”.
Prince Charles is said to have privately called the government’s plans “appalling”.
But Boris Johnson has again defended the controversial policy, claiming the move is necessary to stop illegal people-smuggling rackets on either side of the Channel.